Two years ago, Microsoft's Xbox console debuted with its first must-have game, "Halo: Combat Evolved."
That's the opening line of Associated Press writer Matt Slagle's review of Halo for the PC, appearing now in Yahoo News and, no doubt, in newspapers around the country. Those two years might have been used garnering information pertinent and useful for writing a review of Halo (or indeed for any computer game). Sadly, Mr. Slagle seems to have been doing something else with his time.
The review ranges from the merely inaccurate...
You play as Master Sergeant, an armor-clad space marine in the crosshairs of a war with an advanced collective of aliens called The Covenant.
Master Chief, guy. Look, it's even got fewer letters! It's easier to type than Sergeant!
... to the glib...
I can't remember the last time an action game had me checking my watch so often.
... to the insulting...
After all, the Xbox is essentially a mid-range PC wrapped inside a black plastic case. Perhaps Microsoft didn't want to crimp sales of its marquee Xbox game. Whatever the reason, Halo on the PC is too little, too late.
The Xbox's processor and hard drive might qualify it as "mid-range", but its GPU is not-- and certainly was not when it was launched a full two years ago.
... and finally the contradictory...
For owners of extremely fancy, high-end computers costing thousands of dollars, Halo's graphics are sure to dazzle.
Hold on a second here. At first, the author wonders why Halo took "so long" to come to the PC, since the Xbox is basically a "midrange" PC, and then he complains that the system requirements are too high, because most users don't have the horsepower to see the dazzling graphics?
Here's a clue, Mr. Slagle. The Xbox version was for those people. The PC version is basically for people with high-end computers costing "thousands" of dollars. (Last time I checked, almost all the computers worth having cost "thousands of dollars". If your budget runs more to the "hundreds of dollars" range, and you want to play Halo, buy an Xbox.
And for you, dear readers? Well, if anyone else feels like (politely, please) letting Mr. Slagle feel that he was perhaps ill-prepared to produce this review, then perhaps sending him a nice email would do the trick.
Have a nice day!
Thanks to GlennKM in the HBO forum who pointed out this review.
UPDATE: Shishka, over at HBO, noted that he emailed Slagle, who said a corrected article has been submitted. No note of what (other than the Master Sergeant flub) would be changed. At this moment, the original article is still available.
Comments
Anonymous (not verified)
Re: .. got to be kidding me.
Anonymous:
: Anonymous:
:
: For those of you with half a brain could see that for anyone
: to invest in buying this game at $49 or higher when the DAMN
: THING was used as bait to buy an Xbox in the first damn
: place are fools!
:
: It was fun to think "IM GETTING THAT” when it was premiered
: as the "Tribes Killer" so long ago only to have it ripped
: away by Microsoft to be released EXSCLUSIVELY?!? For Xbox?..
: If Microsoft is going to grab and Whore out these games
: for their little GPU in a basket and not concentrate on the
: constantly evolving platforms that PUSH the limits to be set
: FOR console gaming outright TRAGEDYS like HALO and MIDDTOWN
: MADNESS and anything else REMOTELY entertaining for PC to be
: sent From the Xbox BACK to pc without so much as a DAMN
: retool (Freelancer.. Don’t tell me that shit was
: finished.. That was half assed and was in development BEFORE
: HALO AND STILL SUCKED.. ALA ((Dai Katana))
:
:
: Halo is but a stale basket of Easter eggs with some new
: paint ACCIDENTLY SPOOGED on the DAMN TIP
:
: Release Halo for PC and Xbox at the same time MORONS..
: You’ll get more money and appease many a hurt reputation in
: the eyes of gamer’s pc and console alike.
:
: If Bethesda could do it for MORROWIND im sure MICROSOFT can
: fanny up the same for halo 2